1. I have reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
2. a. doesn't meet the rule of three because it can answered with a list.
b. meets the rule of three because it takes depth and is ambiguous.
c. meets the rule of three because it has great wording and has depth.
d. doesn't meet the rule of three because it can answered with a list.
3. How can a negligence lawyer ensure a winning case for his/her client?
No comments:
Post a Comment